Our PM Narendra Modi ji is emerging a mass leader day by day. He is very good in packaging and marketing, and he catches the mind of common people. He is being successful in managing his image building by reflecting only positive issues (only verbal not in execution), I would like to question media also for its role being a tool of Modi ji's quiver. Here are some facts.
- When Arvind Kejriwal questioned Nitin Gadkari and pronounced him as a corrupt, media started questioning Kejriwal as he is charging with fake allegations, instead of asking question to Gadkari. In my view, along with Kejriwal, Nitin Gadkari should have also been questioned.
- In the same case, when Kejriwal was asked by the court to take bail and then Kejriwal refused to take it saying that if he is right why should he demand for bail- he wanted not to give a walk-over to Gadkari. Then media started criticising Kejriwal without questioning the role of Gadkari.
- Now, few days ago Gadkari was fined Rs. 10,000.00 by the court for not providing the papers to support his defamation case on Kejriwal. None of the media houses broadcasted 'Breaking News' or conducted prime time debate.
- Today also, Somnath Bharti, who was a minister in Kejriwal's government and alleged by Human Right Commission, and also badly criticised by media, is exonerated by the Delhi High Court. Now there is no noise in media.
- BJP president Amit Shah headed extortion gang told by CBI to Supreme Court in 2011. But now the news is coming that CBI is trying to make this case weaker so that Amit Shah can make a easy escape. Now this is not a misuse of CBI, as BJP was alleging UPA government- another U-turn.
My question is why do not media houses raise the issues impartially?
Please think and then respond!
