Friday, December 26, 2014

Image of Narendra Modi and role of media



Our PM Narendra Modi ji is emerging a mass leader day by day. He is very good in packaging and marketing, and he catches the mind of common people. He is being successful in managing his image building by reflecting only positive issues (only verbal not in execution), I would like to question media also for its role being a tool of Modi ji's quiver. Here are some facts.
  1. When Arvind Kejriwal questioned Nitin Gadkari and pronounced him as a corrupt, media started questioning Kejriwal as he is charging with fake allegations, instead of asking question to Gadkari. In my view, along with Kejriwal, Nitin Gadkari should have also been questioned.
  2. In the same case, when Kejriwal was asked by the court to take bail and then Kejriwal refused to take it saying that if he is right why should he demand for bail- he wanted not to give a walk-over to Gadkari. Then media started criticising Kejriwal without questioning the role of Gadkari.
  3. Now, few days ago Gadkari was fined Rs. 10,000.00 by the court for not providing the papers to support his defamation case on Kejriwal. None of the media houses broadcasted 'Breaking News' or conducted prime time debate.
  4. Today also, Somnath Bharti, who was a minister in Kejriwal's government and alleged by Human Right Commission, and also badly criticised by media, is exonerated by the Delhi High Court. Now there is no noise in media.
  5. BJP president Amit Shah headed extortion gang told by CBI to Supreme Court in 2011. But now the news is coming that CBI is trying to make this case weaker so that Amit Shah can make a easy escape. Now this is not a misuse of CBI, as BJP was alleging UPA government- another U-turn.

My question is why do not media houses raise the issues impartially?

Please think and then respond!

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Narendra Modi: Following the Congress or Outdating it



Black money has become the issue of nation-wide debate. Unfortunately, an issue of economic concerns has now been trivialized by making it a tool of opportunistic politics. Narendra Modi, now Prime Minister of India, has been continuously saying in every electoral rally during the parliamentary election that if he will come in power, he will bring black money to India within 100 days without saying it complications to the people. Now, around 150 days of his incumbency have been passed but not a single penny is brought to the country. In reverse of his statements, it appears that NDA government is hiding the names of the alleged fishes. Honorable Supreme Court of India has to say that government is acting like a protecting umbrella for the alleged, and also commented that if this will be the way of investigation this money cannot be brought in our life time. I think people should consider these comments and force this government to respect the saying of its Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
During his campaign, Narendra Modi was strongly saying and also gave a slogan "Congress Mukt Bharat". If I look his way of decisions, he is following the same way as Congress was walking on. He is adapting the policies of the previous UPA government be it black money issue or Arun Jately´s comment on CAG. Therefore, I would say Narendra Modi is eradicating Congress party by following it, not by outdating it. He has the same stand on black money saying we cannot reveal the names as we have treaty with other countries, then why he or his party agitated on road and disturbed the parliament during UPA time? All the allegations BJP has made on Congress should be read by PM Modi, and if he cannot do anything then all the allegations made will fit to BJP and Modi´s government- it just needs to replace the name of Congress and Manmohan Singh with BJP and Narendra Modi, respectively, from it.
Once again people of India are feeling helpless. But, I think the younger generation is more aware and cannot be fooled, after all it has the power of ballet. I wish people will teach this government like as they did to Congress.

Sunday, May 11, 2014

Higher-yielding crop plants? Plant hormone has dual role in triggering flower formation

Summary: A plant hormone once believed to promote flower formation in annual plants also plays a role in inhibiting flowers from forming. The dual role of this hormone, gibberellin, could be exploited to produce higher-yielding crop plants.


A new paper by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania published in the journal Science has revealed that a plant hormone once believed to promote flower formation in annual plants also plays a role in inhibiting flowers from forming. The dual role of this hormone, gibberellin, could be exploited to produce higher-yielding crop plants.

The study was led by Nobutoshi Yamaguchi and Doris Wagner of the School of Arts and Sciences' Department of Biology. Wagner is professor and graduate chair, and Yamaguchi is a postdoctoral researcher. Department co-authors included Cara M. Winter, Miin-Feng Wu and Ayako Yamaguchi. The Penn team collaborated with Yuri Kanno and Mitsunori Seo of RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science in Japan.

Plant scientists used to think that short-lived plants, annuals or bi-annuals, use a different strategy from long-lived plants, perennials, to regulate flower production.

"Anecdotal evidence was that the hormone gibberellin promoted the switch to flower formation in short-lived plants, along with other cues such as temperature, season and photoperiod," Wagner said. "But in the long-lived plants, like in fruit trees, people have known that if you sprayed them with the hormone it inhibited flower production. So it was a big puzzle: why would the same hormone do one thing in short-lived plants and another in long-lived plants?"

To address this paradox, the Penn team began by looking for new genes important to the flower-forming process. Specifically, they performed a genome-wide search of the plant species Arabidopsis thaliana to find direct targets of the protein LEAFY, which is known to promote flower formation.

One gene that turned up was called ELA1, which produces a cytochrome enzyme and has been shown to play a role in breaking down gibberellin. Further experiments showed that in plants that lost ELA1 function, flowers formed much later than normal.

The researchers also found that plants that lacked LEAFY had high levels of gibberellin, and plants engineered to produce high levels of LEAFY had lower levels of the hormone and were also shorter with greater levels of chlorophyll -- characteristics of gibberellin deficiency.

"At first we were confused because gibberellin was supposed to promote all of this activity that leads to flower formation," Wagner said. "Then when we found a direct target of LEAFY that is linked to gibberellin catabolism, that gave us the clue that gibberellin must have a role in inhibiting flower formation as well."

Plants that were genetically modified to not produce gibberellin properly and plants that were treated with a gibberellin inhibitor showed signs of a delayed first transition to inflorescence but accelerated signs of flower formation. Spraying the plants with gibberellin had the opposite effect.

The results suggested that the two transition steps that lead plants to produce flowers might be regulated distinctly, both involving gibberellin. While gibberellin promotes the first transition, in which plants stop producing stems and leaves and produce an inflorescence, it inhibited the second stage, in which flowers were formed.

The mechanism, the Penn team showed, involves rising and then falling levels of gibberellin. High levels cause the plant to end the vegetative phase of development. At that point, LEAFY and ELA1 activity cause gibberellin to break down. Freed from the inhibitory effects of the hormone, a suite of proteins are activated that trigger flower formation.

"When it comes to determining the number of flowers formed and when they are formed, we think this pathway is at the forefront," Wagner said.

Farmers already use gibberellin-deficient breeds of rice to produce more compact plants that don't topple over in wind and rain. The new understanding of gibberellin's role gained from this study could help create plant breeds that are even more productive

"We think it can be used to enhance yield," Wagner said. "Seeds are the product of a flower so if you want more seed you want more flowers. Being able to modulate the accumulation or degradation of gibberellin could allow one to optimize or enhance the seed set and yield in crop plants."

The Penn team plans to explore other plants to see if gibberellin operates the same way across species and in perennials as well and to further explore how different levels of the hormone trigger regulatory events that either inhibit or promote flower production.

The National Science Foundation supported the research.
Story Source: Science Daily

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

My Review Article: Natural killer T cell anergy, co-stimulatory molecules and immunotherapeutic interventions

Available online 25 December 2013

Avadhesh Kumar Singh | Poonam Gaur | Satya N. Das

Abstract:
Natural killer T (NKT) cells are a unique subset of glycolipid reactive T lymphocytes that share properties with natural killer (NK) cells. These lymphocytes can produce array of cytokines and chemokines that modulate the immune response, and play a pivotal role in cancer, autoimmunity, infection and inflammation. Owing to these properties, NKT cells have gained attentions for its potential use in antitumor immunotherapies. To date several NKT cell-based clinical trials have been performed in patients with cancer using its potent ligand α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer). However, inconsistent therapeutic benefit, and inevitable health risks associated with drug dose and NKT cell activation have been observed. α-GalCer-activated NKT cells become anergic and produce both Th1 and Th2 cytokines that may function antagonistically, limiting the desired effector functions. Besides, various co-stimulatory and signaling molecules such as programmed death-1 (PD-1; CD279), casitas B-cell lymphoma-b (Cbl-b) and CARMA1 have been shown to be implicated in the induction of NKT cell anergy. In this review, we discuss the role of such key regulators and their functional mechanisms that may facilitate the development of improved approaches to overcome NKT cell anergy. In addition, we describe the evidences indicating that tailored-ligands can optimally activate NKT cells to obtain desired immune responses. 


Click below to read full article:

Natural killer T cell anergy, co-stimulatory molecules and immunotherapeutic interventions

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...